The Reid Technique
![]() |
The Reid technique is the basis of the widely used "Criminal Interrogation and Confessions" manual we already mentioned. It lays out nine steps or issues guiding interrogation. Many of these steps overlap, and there is no such thing as a "typical" interrogation; but the Reid technique provides a blueprint of how a successful interrogation might unfold.
Confrontation
The detective presents the facts of the
case and informs the suspect of the evidence against him. This evidence
might be real, or it might be made up. The detective typically states in
a confident manner that the suspect is involved in the crime. The
suspect's stress level starts increasing, and the interrogator may move
around the room and invade the suspect's personal space to increase the
discomfort.
If the suspect starts fidgeting, licking his lips and or grooming himself (running his hand through his hair, for instance), the detective takes these as indicators of deception and knows he's on the right track.
Theme development
The interrogator creates a story
about why the suspect committed the crime. Theme development is about
looking through the eyes of the suspect to figure out why he did it, why
he'd like to think he did it and what type of excuse might make him
admit he did it. Does the suspect use any particular mode of reasoning
more often than others? For example, does he seem willing to blame the
victim? The detective lays out a theme, a story, that the suspect can
latch on to in order to either excuse or justify his part in the crime,
and the detective then observes the suspect to see if he likes the
theme. Is he paying closer attention than before? Nodding his head? If
so, the detective will continue to develop that theme; if not, he'll
pick a new theme and start over. Theme development is in the background
throughout the interrogation. When developing themes, the interrogator
speaks in a soft, soothing voice to appear non-threatening and to lull
the suspect into a false sense of security.
Stopping denials
Letting the suspect deny his guilt
will increase his confidence, so the detective tries to interrupt all
denials, sometimes telling the suspect it'll be his turn to talk in a
moment, but right now, he needs to listen. From the start of the
interrogation, the detective watches for denials and stops the suspect
before he can voice them. In addition to keeping the suspect's
confidence low, stopping denials also helps quiet the suspect so he
doesn't have a chance to ask for a lawyer. If there are no denials
during theme development, the detective takes this as a positive
indicator of guilt. If initial attempts at denial slow down or stop
during theme development, the interrogator knows he has found a good
theme and that the suspect is getting closer to confessing.
Overcoming objections
Once the interrogator has fully
developed a theme that the suspect can relate to, the suspect may offer
logic-based objections as opposed to simple denials, like "I could never
rape somebody -- my sister was raped and I saw how much pain it caused.
I would never do that to someone." The detective handles these
differently than he does denials, because these objections can give him
information to turn around and use against the suspect. The interrogator
might say something like, "See, that's good, you're telling me you
would never plan this, that it was out of your control. You care about
women like your sister -- it was just a one-time mistake, not a
recurring thing." If the detective does his job right, an objection ends
up looking more like an admission of guilt.

Getting the suspect's attention
At this point, the
suspect should be frustrated and unsure of himself. He may be looking
for someone to help him escape the situation. The interrogator tries to
capitalize on that insecurity by pretending to be the suspect's ally.
He'll try to appear even more sincere in his continued theme
development, and he may get physically closer to the suspect to make it
harder for the suspect to detach from the situation. The interrogator
may offer physical gestures of camaraderie and concern, such as touching
the suspect's shoulder or patting his back.
The suspect loses resolve
If the suspect's body
language indicates surrender -- his head in his hands, his elbows on his
knees, his shoulders hunched -- the interrogator seizes the opportunity
to start leading the suspect into confession. He'll start transitioning
from theme development to motive alternatives (see the next step) that
force the suspect to choose a reason why he committed the crime. At this
stage, the interrogator makes every effort to establish eye contact
with the suspect to increase the suspect's stress level and desire to
escape. If, at this point, the suspect cries, the detective takes this
as a positive indicator of guilt.
Alternatives
The interrogator offers two contrasting
motives for some aspect of the crime, sometimes beginning with a minor
aspect so it's less threatening to the suspect. One alternative is
socially acceptable ("It was a crime of passion"), and the other is
morally repugnant ("You killed her for the money"). The detective builds
up the contrast between the two alternatives until the suspect gives an
indicator of choosing one, like a nod of the head or increased signs of
surrender. Then, the detective speeds things up.

Bringing the suspect into the conversation
Once the
suspect chooses an alternative, the confession has begun. The
interrogator encourages the suspect to talk about the crime and arranges
for at least two people to witness the confession. One may be the
second detective in room, and another may be brought in for the purpose
of forcing the suspect to confess to a new detective -- having to
confess to a new person increases the suspect's stress level and his
desire to just sign a statement and get out of there. Bringing a new
person into the room also forces the suspect to reassert his socially
acceptable reason for the crime, reinforcing the idea that the
confession is a done deal.
The confession
The final stage of an interrogation is
all about getting the confession admitted at trial. The interrogator
will have the suspect write out his confession or state it on videotape.
The suspect is usually willing to do anything at this point to escape
the interrogation. The suspect confirms that his confession is
voluntary, not coerced, and signs the statement in front of witnesses.
When You've Got Company The
Just Cause Law Collective warns that if you're arrested with friends,
you've got to keep a cool head. Decide beforehand that no one's going to
say a word until everyone has a lawyer, and remind yourself that police
will try to play on the natural paranoia that arises when people are
separated. The Collective offers a further warning regarding a group
arrest: When you have your strategy discussion, don't do it in the back
seat of a police car. If the officers stuffed you all into one car and
walked away, they're recording you. |
It should be noted here that in the United States, if at any point during the interrogation the suspect does somehow manage to ask for a lawyer or invoke his right to silence, the interrogation has to stop immediately. That's why it's so important to interrupt the suspect's attempts to speak in the initial stages -- if he invokes his rights, the interrogation is over.
The steps we've laid out here represent some of the psychological techniques that detectives use to get confessions from suspects. But a real interrogation doesn't always follow the textbook. Next, let's take a look at an actual police interrogation that ended with an admissible confession.

