The Presidential Records Act Is Essential for the National Archives

By: Shannon Bow O'Brien  | 
FBI at Mar-a-lago
Secret Service and Palm Beach police stand in front of the home of former President Donald Trump at Mar-A-Lago Aug. 8, 2022 in Palm Beach, Florida, after the FBI served a warrant for classified White House documents. Eva Marie Uzcategui/Getty Images

A new indictment of former President Donald Trump on July 27, 2023, added another charge related to retention of classified documents to an existing indictment issued last month. The charges followed a long process of the National Archives and Records Administration asking the former president on multiple occasions to return the records he took with him after he left office. The Conversation U.S. asked Shannon Bow O'Brien, a scholar of the presidency at the University of Texas, Austin College of Liberal Arts, to discuss the history, law and customs associated with presidential archives.

Advertisement

How Do the Archivists Actually Know What's Missing? Isn't That Hard to Figure Out?

The archivists probably have a really keen idea of what is and what isn’t missing, based upon things that they’ve gotten out of other offices, like the vice president’s office and things that got deposited from the secretary of state, for example. There are a lot of papers that are referenced and cross-referenced, multiple copies or multiple things going in and out of offices.

One scholar did a study of the presidents’ annual Christmas speech at the Ellipse in Washington. He looked at how the speeches — from the Roosevelt administration to the present — developed, and it was kind of a ring-around-the-rosie inside the West Wing and within the departments — what went in, what went out, what went in, what went out. Who won and who didn’t win. Everybody left their marks on the speeches. All of those changes and requests appear in documents, and if part of the conversation is missing from the National Archives, it’s obvious.

Advertisement

We know from other presidents’ records that really comprehensive records are kept via daily manifests of what the presidents are doing. And while I am not a historian, it’s not unreasonable to assume that the other departments and agencies likewise have daily manifests of their top officials. So if they know that someone at an agency sent something over to the White House that was this or that, and it came back from the White House with this or that, then there should be a document somewhere that’s got something from the White House on it — and if you’re missing that, that’s a problem.

Will the Public Find Out What Was in These Documents, Given That They Are Classified?

The indictment against Trump spells out the grade of classification the documents had — they get different levels based on the level of seriousness — but only vaguely refers to the contents. We’ll be lucky to ever know if, and when, the documents get declassified, although some more description of the contents could come out during the trial.

FBI at Mar-a-lago
This Jan. 20, 2021, photo shows aides carrying boxes to Marine One before President Donald Trump and former first lady Melania Trump departed from the White House on Trump's final day in office.
MANDEL NGAN/AFP via Getty Images

Advertisement

What Law Governs What Happens to a President's Documents?

It’s the Presidential Records Act. It came about originally because these guys, the presidents, were just kind of doing whatever the heck they wanted with their records. Hoover donates his; FDR doesn’t.

The act, first passed in 1978, says administrations have to retain “any documentary materials relating to the political activities of the President or members of the President’s staff, but only if such activities relate to or have a direct effect upon the carrying out of constitutional, statutory, or other official or ceremonial duties of the President.”

Advertisement

An administration is allowed to exclude personal records that are purely private or don’t have an effect on the duties of a president. All public events are included, such as quick comments on the South Lawn, short exchanges with reporters and all public speeches, radio addresses and even public telephone calls to astronauts in space. Diaries and journals are off limits, but any papers to carry out the job are public records.

Nixon
The actions of U.S. President Richard Nixon prompted numerous federal presidential record-keeping laws after the Watergate scandal. Nixon is seen here with former Prime Minister of Israel Golda Meir to his left and Secretary of State Henry Kissinger to his right.
Library of Congress

Advertisement

Have There Been Other Controversies Over Presidential Records?

There’s a two-decade background to the case. After he left the presidency, Nixon brokered a deal with the General Services Administration about the retention of his records, but when knowledge of it became public, there was considerable outcry. A large amount of material was to be withheld from public view, and there was concern the depth of Nixon’s true involvement in Watergate would be obscured.

Congress responded and in 1974, President Gerald Ford signed the Presidential Recordings and Materials Preservation Act to specifically apply to Nixon’s presidential materials. It gave the archivists the power to seize materials from Nixon’s time in the White House and return those deemed private.

Advertisement

Nixon immediately sued over who possessed his records. While he had already been pardoned when it was enacted, Nixon was concerned about his reputation and legacy. He wanted control over what the public saw about his time in office. One of the major issues in front of the court involved the disposition of documents he believed were private. Given the scandal associated with his resignation, should these documents be inspected by archivists for veracity?

Did the Government Have the Right to Seize Presidential Documents?

In a 7-2 decision, the Supreme Court rejected all of Nixon’s arguments. They said his privacy rights were still intact because the archivists were not making things immediately public but inspecting them and retaining public items while returning family ones. The court noted the “unblemished record of the archivists for discretion.”

In 2000, the lawsuit was settled over the Nixon records, with the bulk of the settlement money going to pay attorney fees. Some observers were unhappy, because these documents should have already been considered public, but the decision was likely made to finally close this chapter on American history. In 2007, the Nixon library in California became public and integrated into National Archives.

Advertisement

Shannon Bow O'Brien is associate professor of instruction at The University of Texas at Austin College of Liberal Arts.

This article, which includes parts of an article originally published on Feb. 11, 2022, was last updated on July 28, 2023, and is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. You can find the original article here.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Loading...