The East India Company and India
Perhaps it was being stationed halfway across the world from the East India Company's home offices in London. Or maybe it was the potential for wealth afforded by India's riches. Either way, Elihu Yale (the benefactor for whom Yale University is named) was tantalized into building his own smuggling operation. His dismissal from his post as the EIC governor of Madras was a light sentence compared to the fates of others who ran afoul of the company.
Perhaps Yale got away with his life because of the work he'd done on behalf of the EIC. Thanks to factories (colonies or settlements) run by men like Yale, the East India Company was able to subjugate India and its tribal rulers. The company built forts in India to house its private army. The EIC also raised soldiers from within the native populations. With the establishment of martial rule (the government set up in a land occupied by military) profits could be garnered easily. Perhaps the most profitable export for the company's India operations was opium.
By 1750, the EIC had established control over India's most prolific sites of opium cultivation. The British exported the opium to China, which eventually resulted in two opium wars between the countries over the drug's importation. By 1793, Britain had a monopoly on opium, and no Indian grower was allowed to sell his crops to any other company [source: PBS].
The British colonialism carried out through the EIC was pretty brutal. It included the forceful seizure of land and deposing of rulers. Tribute, taxes and loyalty were extracted from average citizens through methods up to and including torture [source: Emory University]. Ultimately, the British presence proved to be unacceptable for some Indians. A number of sepoys (native Indians who joined the EIC's militia) revolted against the EIC's rule during the Sepoy Rebellion of 1857. Some historians consider this India's first war for independence, even though it was quelled by the British army. Afterward, Great Britain officially occupied the country. India would remain an English colony until 1947, when it became a constitutional republic [source: CNN].
The eventual creation of modern-day India and the United States are but two major world events that have the East India Company's fingerprints. It would be nearly impossible to trace the entire legacy -- both positive and negative impacts -- that the East India Company had on the world. With direct involvement in so many different aspects of our world, perhaps the question isn't "how did the East India Company change the world," but "how didn't it?"
Related HowStuffWorks Articles
More Great Links
- Bryan, William Jennings, ed. "The World's Famous Orations; Vol. IV: Great Britain: II (1780-1861): The tyranny of the East India Company; Charles James Fox." New York: Funk and Wagnalls. 1906. http://www.bartleby.com/268/4/5.html
- Greenhouse, Linda. "The Supreme Court: Advertising; Nike free speech case is unexpectedly returned to California." New York Times. June 27, 2003. http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9F0CE5DA1E3BF934A15755C0A9659C8B63
- Harris, Ron, "The Formation of the East India Company as a Deal between Entrepreneurs and Outside Investors." Tel Aviv University. http://ssrn.com/abstract=567941
- Hartmann, Thom. "Now corporations claim the right to lie." Common Dreams. January 1, 2003. http://www.commondreams.org/cgi-bin/print.cgi?file=/views03/0101-07.htm
- Hartmann, Thom. "Unequal protection: The rise of corporate dominance and the theft of human rights." St. Martin's Press. 2002.
- Kaplan, Amy and Pease, Donald E. "Cultures of United States Imperialism" Duke University Press. 1993. http://books.google.com/books?id=I4v0lm3i3awC&pg=PA97&lpg=PA97&dq=elihu+yale+private+trader&source=web&ots=ZMRIq-v9dM&sig=57QLZ7AbkxeIYVD0xxwQA6RwNgk&hl=en
- Nader, Ralph and Mayer, Carl J. "Corporations are not persons." New York Times. April 9, 1988.http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=940DE7DA1E30F93AA35757C0A96E948260&sec=&spon=&pagewanted=all
- Patel, Nilesh. "The Sepoy War of 1857." Emory University. Spring 1998. http://english.emory.edu/Bahri/Mutiny.html
- Sherman, Charles Phineas. "Roman law in the modern world." Harvard University. 1917. http://books.google.com/books?id=O10MAAAAYAAJ&pg=PA117&lpg=PA117&dq=roman+law+artificial+persons&source=web&ots=jXcYymRyrH&sig=03OFrH7kFgjdESCP3Rs3_8Kpd5c&hl=en
- "A century of lawmaking for a new nation: U.S. Congressional documents and debates, 1774-1875." Library of Congress. http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llsl&fileName=014/llsl014.db&recNum=389
- "About Yale: History." Yale University. http://www.yale.edu/about/history.html
- "Ancient Roman ideas of law." University of Virginia. 2003. http://etext.virginia.edu/cgi-local/DHI/dhi.cgi?id=dv2-76
- "British East India Company." NNDB. 2008. http://www.nndb.com/company/480/000162991/
- "Elihu Yale." BBC. http://www.bbc.co.uk/wales/northeast/guides/halloffame/historical/elihu_yale.shtml
- "Exhibit reveals corruption behind the 'glitter' of East India Company." Yale Bulletin. March 30, 2007. http://www.yale.edu/opa/v35.n23/story12.html
- "India and Pakistan: Fifty years of independence." CNN. 1997. http://www.cnn.com/WORLD/9708/India97/india/timeline/
- "Limited liability company." United States Internal Revenue Service. http://www.irs.gov/businesses/small/article/0,,id=98277,00.html
- "Opium throughout history." PBS. 1998. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/heroin/etc/history.html
- "Warren Hastings (1732-1818)." Daniel Nash Ford's Royal Berkshire History. 2001. http://www.berkshirehistory.com/bios/whastings.html
- "William Kidd - the unlucky pirate." BBC. http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/A6985830