Effectiveness of the Virtual Border Fence
Tracking the effectiveness of border security is a difficult task. Does the number of arrests of illegal immigrants and drug traffickers indicate success? If there are fewer arrests, does that mean people are being deterred by the fence or simply finding another way around? If there are more arrests, does that mean more people are slipping into the country unnoticed or that enforcement has improved? These are questions that commentators, politicians and law enforcement officials continue to ponder.
What's beyond dispute is that the virtual border fence uses top-of-the-line technology. Some aspects of the virtual fence have been used before along the California-Mexico border and in Iraq and Afghanistan, but never before have so many diverse technologies come together to police one border. Will that give law enforcement the upper hand, or will a network of up to 1,800 towers, each with its own set of cameras, radars and other devices, overwhelm the understaffed Border Patrol? Again, answering these questions will take time. But critics point to past efforts at boosting border security in which billions of dollars have been doled out, frequently with disappointing results. The fence along parts of the California-Mexico border is still unfinished after 13 years of construction and is far over budget. In other cases, contracts were awarded only to have cameras not installed, numerous false alarms and an increase rather than a decrease in illegal traffic. On April 25, 2007, the Border Patrol's sole Predator 2 drone, a $6.5 million unmanned aerial vehicle frequently used by the U.S. military in Iraq and Afghanistan, crashed in Arizona after only seven months of use.
Border security is an issue that many Americans care strongly about. Proponents of virtual and physical fencing point not only to the need to decrease illegal migrant traffic but also to concerns about drug smuggling and terrorism. On December 14, 1999, Ahmed Ressam was stopped and arrested near a Canadian border crossing. He was on his way to Los Angeles to attempt to blow up Los Angeles International Airport as part of the "Millennium Plot." Border security advocates cite this foiled terrorist operation as evidence that improving border security goes beyond stemming illegal immigration.
For more information about the virtual border fence and other related topics, check out the links below.
Related HowStuffWorks Articles
More Great Links
- U.S. Customs and Border Protection
- U.S. Tests 'Virtual' Border Fence in Arizona
- "The Millenium Plot." GlobalSecurity.org.
- "'Virtual fence' unwelcome eyes in the sky." Associated Press. Northwest Herald. June 11, 2007.
- Broache, Anne. "Administration touts 'virtual border fence plans." CNet News. June 1, 2006.
- Davis, Tony. "Grijalva seeks environmental alternatives to border fence." Arizona Daily Star. June 11, 2007.
- Goodwyn, Wade. "Plans for 20-Foot Border Fence Rile Texas Residents." NPR. June 15, 2007.
- Hsu, Spencer S. and White, Griff. "Plenty of Holes Seen In a 'Virtual Fence.'" Washington Post. Sept. 21, 2006.
- Inskeep, Steve and Robbins, Ted. "U.S. Tests 'Virtual' Border Fence in Arizona." NPR. June 18, 2007.
- McEver, Melissa. "Environmental groups petition feds to consider border fence's impact on wildlife." The Monitor. June 13, 2007.
- Rothstein, Arthur H. "Virtual fence along Mexican border has turned ranchers' solitude into 'war zone.'" Associated Press. The Salt Lake Tribune. June 4, 2007.