More Anger Experiments
|
|
In the end, the results of both tests showed that angry students were more successful than the control group of neutral students at picking out the stronger arguments.
The tests seemed to support the researchers' assertions, but they decided to be more rigorous. In the third and final test, students completed a written assessment to determine their analytical ability. Those who were deemed less analytically inclined were divided from those who appeared more analytical. The less analytical subjects were presented with arguments about introducing mandatory comprehensive exams for graduating college students, an idea that was believed to be quite unpopular. Among the less analytical subjects, the angry ones were better at distinguishing strong from weak arguments. The neutral subjects didn't show any increase in analytic ability.
We'll examine the conclusions drawn by Dr. Moons and Dr. Mackie about anger and decision making in the next section.

